Einbinder’s Emmy Speech: “Go Birds, F*** ICE & Free Palestine”

On September 14, 2025, Hannah Einbinder made headlines at the 77th Emmy Awards when she accepted the award for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Comedy Series for her role in Hacks.

While thanking her colleagues and co-star Jean Smart, Einbinder ended her speech with a bold political statement:

“Go Birds, f*** ICE, and free Palestine.”

Here are the key facts and reactions:

Key Facts

1. First Emmy Win
   This was Einbinder’s first Emmy win after four previous nominations. She plays Ava Daniels in Hacks.
2. Censorship on Broadcast
   Her expletive “f*** ICE” was bleeped during the CBS television broadcast, although it was audible in the live audience and in unedited recordings online.
3. What is ICE?
   ICE refers to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the federal agency responsible for immigration enforcement within the United States.
4. “Free Palestine” Statement & Activism
   Einbinder also called for “free Palestine.” She has been vocal in activism, supporting appeals related to Gaza, and signed the Film Workers for Palestine pledge, among other public statements.
5. Time-Limit Fundraising & Cost
   This year, the Emmy host Nate Bargatze introduced a rule: for every minute a winner goes over their allotted speech time, money is deducted from a donation to the Boys & Girls Club of America. According to reports, Einbinder exceeded her time and will have to “pay the difference,” which is estimated at $10,000.

Reactions & Context

• The audience gave strong applause in response to her closing line.
• Media outlets noted that this speech is part of a wider trend of celebrities using awards shows to raise awareness for political or humanitarian issues.
• There are mixed opinions: some praised her courage and use of platform, others criticized her for bringing politics into an entertainment event.

Why It Matters

• Free Speech & Platform: Einbinder’s speech highlights how entertainers increasingly view major events as platforms for advocacy rather than purely for celebration.
• Political Polarisation: Issues like immigration enforcement (ICE) and the Israel-Palestine conflict are deeply divisive; statements like this can intensify debates.
• Responsibility & Consequences: The cost (monetary or reputational) for going over time or making controversial statements shows what is at stake when mixing activism with televised events.